|
Post by Cygnus X-1 on May 3, 2004 16:27:50 GMT -5
Mav, keep on topic for once.
|
|
|
Post by Juan on May 3, 2004 16:28:32 GMT -5
Actually, the Glitchiness is partially caused by the ammount of people on at times. We have a stellar ammount of active members compared to the old Bar's prime's.
|
|
|
Post by Cygnus X-1 on May 3, 2004 16:31:30 GMT -5
Heh, owned.
|
|
|
Post by Ai on May 3, 2004 16:31:48 GMT -5
Listen to the lady.
|
|
|
Post by Steel on May 3, 2004 16:53:11 GMT -5
Actually, the Glitchiness is partially caused by the ammount of people on at times. We have a stellar ammount of active members compared to the old Bar's prime's. You mean the server as a whole don't you? Well, as soon as server 22 is upgraded, such problems will disappear.
|
|
|
Post by Juan on May 3, 2004 17:05:37 GMT -5
No.
I meant the Bar itself. Ever notice the messages you get about too many people logging? Thats this board itself. The ammount of members we have online at any given time bothers the server limits I think.
|
|
|
Post by Triyun on May 3, 2004 17:29:58 GMT -5
During normal hours we seem to have as many logging on as Animex had at moderate hours
|
|
|
Post by Wag - Now And Forever on May 3, 2004 19:10:44 GMT -5
Yeah, but there's just somthing about that place...oh...now I remember...
|
|
|
Post by DarkAries on May 3, 2004 19:14:04 GMT -5
Yeah, didn't they have like bad health care or a crummy septic system or something?
Aries forgets...
|
|
|
Post by Meyo-san on May 3, 2004 20:02:00 GMT -5
No. I meant the Bar itself. Ever notice the messages you get about too many people logging? Thats this board itself. The ammount of members we have online at any given time bothers the server limits I think. No, it's just that this server sucks.
|
|
|
Post by Raz V5.0 on May 3, 2004 20:03:58 GMT -5
No, it's just that this server sucks. But the board is good, so I'd say it is a fair trade off.
|
|
|
Post by Meyo-san on May 3, 2004 20:04:49 GMT -5
It all depends on the definition of a good board.
|
|
|
Post by Raz V5.0 on May 3, 2004 20:05:32 GMT -5
It all depends on the definition of a good board. Well, my definition is... Not admined by Mav.
|
|
|
Post by Centurimon on May 3, 2004 20:05:48 GMT -5
It all depends on the definition of a good board. Good board = this place with some improvements.
|
|
|
Post by Meyo-san on May 3, 2004 20:06:49 GMT -5
Well, my definition is... Not admined by Mav. Considering that your board had a prime of, what, 1 member on at a time?
|
|