|
|
Post by Juan on Oct 18, 2004 14:37:47 GMT -5
They never existed. They were made up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Meyo-san on Oct 18, 2004 18:12:05 GMT -5
They never existed. They were made up. Well that screws up the population count. |
|
|
|
Post by Infested Manae on Oct 18, 2004 20:08:52 GMT -5
Here's something to consider, though. It might be nothing at all. Anyway.
The plane was reportedly traveling at 550 mph, correct?
That's 806.67 feet per second.
Considering that counted segment of film:
6 frames/second -- 134.45 feet per frame
7 fps -- 115.24 feet per frame
If we could get an accurate measurement of how much ground that camera covered, we need to ask: would the plane have to be in that first frame? More importantly, did they skip any frames in that run? The fireball makes it look like they didn't, yet they may have numbered a frame 1, skipped a several seconds of film, and started there for 2 to 6... Point being, if you watch that, the only thing that looked like the plane was the mountains in the backround.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tobari Sabbatine on Oct 20, 2004 23:34:53 GMT -5
the Pentagon was made to take and missle attack. I'm going with what the gov said but it is odd that a plain like that could fly at 5 feet above ground.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triyun on Oct 21, 2004 1:12:48 GMT -5
The renovated sections are. The pre-renovated which was not the part that got hit wasn't, it was built before missiles were invented.
|
|
|
|
Post by Juan on Oct 23, 2004 22:51:59 GMT -5
Meh, the thing would never have hit the Pentagon in the first place if we still had the surface air missiles at the Pentagon.
|
|
|
|
Post by Infested Manae on Oct 24, 2004 9:34:14 GMT -5
Makes you wonder if they didn't re-install them...
|
|
|
|
Post by Cygnus X-1 on Oct 24, 2004 11:39:00 GMT -5
That wouldn't do any good. They wouldn't be able to find, none the less target the plane. If you'll read the 9/11 Commission Report, you'll see that even NORAD couldn't find them until it was too late.
|
|
|
|
Post by Juan on Oct 24, 2004 12:09:25 GMT -5
Localized detection devices can detect things a hella faster than NORAD can.
|
|
|
|
Post by Infested Manae on Oct 24, 2004 12:34:31 GMT -5
Yeah, really. Any airport has a control tower that knows the location within a second or two of every plane in their airspace. I thought Norad focused more on knowing where every satalite was in orbit.  |
|
|
|
Post by Meyo-san on Oct 25, 2004 8:32:32 GMT -5
No, actually NORAD was made to detect airplanes that want to hit buildings...  |
|
|
|
Post by Cygnus X-1 on Oct 28, 2004 19:22:37 GMT -5
That's under the assumption that they have their signal-tracking things on. (I have no idea what they're called.)
But the fact remains, neither the airports nor NORAD could find any of the planes one they shut their transmissions off. They were, quite literally, lost to them. What makes you think that the pentagon wouldn't suffer the same difficulties?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Giant-Size Man Thing on Nov 5, 2004 21:10:00 GMT -5
 Logic: 1 Conspiracy Theorist: 0. |
|
Black Ace
Delta
"So how are you going to live that life as if nothing happened?"- Ryoji Kaji, NGE
Posts: 220
|
Post by Black Ace on Nov 5, 2004 22:53:47 GMT -5
As much as I wish that would be enough to put this theory to rest, Goji, conspiracy theorists aren't so easily deterred...
|
|
|
|
Post by Juan on Nov 5, 2004 23:01:41 GMT -5
That's under the assumption that they have their signal-tracking things on. (I have no idea what they're called.) But the fact remains, neither the airports nor NORAD could find any of the planes one they shut their transmissions off. They were, quite literally, lost to them. What makes you think that the pentagon wouldn't suffer the same difficulties? ... because the Pentagon is like a billion times more advanced then any airport, and NORAD is like what, 30 years old now? |
|
